If you were hurt on ice, a broken sidewalk, a wet floor, or another dangerous condition in Grand Rapids, a Grand Rapids slip and fall lawyer can help you understand whether you may still have a premises liability claim, even if the hazard was visible.
A 2023 Michigan Supreme Court decision changed how courts evaluate the open and obvious doctrine, which means property owners can no longer use visibility alone as an automatic defense.
Goodman Acker represents injured people in Grand Rapids, Kent County, and West Michigan, and we can help you understand whether you have a claim. Call our Grand Rapids office at 616-582-7225.

Grand Rapids sees some of the heaviest snowfall in lower Michigan, and the freeze-thaw cycles that come with West Michigan winters create hazardous walking conditions for months at a time.
Icy parking lots, snow-covered sidewalks, and wet entryways are common sources of serious falls in Kent County, and property owners have a legal obligation to address those conditions.
Lake effect snow off Lake Michigan hits the Grand Rapids metro area harder than most parts of the state.
Commercial property owners along the 28th Street corridor, downtown Grand Rapids, and the East Beltline retail areas face a continuous duty to salt, plow, and maintain safe walkways throughout winter. Falling behind on that duty puts visitors at risk.
Our firm operates a Grand Rapids office at 1500 East Beltline Avenue SE and has represented injured people across Michigan for over 30 years.
We assign one attorney, one paralegal, and one assistant to every case, and your team stays the same from the first call through resolution.
Our attorneys handle premises liability claims in the Kent County 17th Circuit Court and in courts across the state.

Yes. In July 2023, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its ruling in Kandil-Elsayed v. F&E Oil, Inc., 512 Mich. 95 (2023), and overruled more than two decades of precedent. The visibility of a hazard is no longer an automatic defense that ends a case before trial.
Before Kandil-Elsayed, Michigan courts treated the open and obvious doctrine as a question of duty. If a property owner argued that a reasonable person would have noticed the hazard, the case could be dismissed before a jury ever heard it.
That framework came from the 2001 Lugo v. Ameritech decision, and it blocked recovery for thousands of injured people over 22 years.
The Michigan Supreme Court moved the open and obvious analysis from the duty element to the breach and comparative fault elements. A jury now weighs the visibility of the hazard alongside the property owner’s failure to address it.
Property owners still raise the argument, but it no longer functions as an automatic shield against liability. This shift matters for Grand Rapids slip and fall claims, where ice and snow hazards are often visible but functionally unavoidable.
A slip and fall claim in Michigan requires proof that a property owner’s negligence caused your injury. Michigan law ties the property owner’s duty of care to your status on the property at the time of the fall.
The table below shows the three visitor categories under Michigan premises liability law and the duty owed to each.
| VISITOR STATUS | DEFINITION | DUTY OWED |
| Invitee | Customer, client, or person invited for business purposes | Highest duty: inspect, repair, and warn of known and discoverable hazards |
| Licensee | Social guest or person with permission but no business purpose | Warn of known hidden dangers only |
| Trespasser | Person without permission | Refrain from willful or wanton harm |
Most Grand Rapids slip and fall claims involve invitees, meaning customers inside stores, shoppers in parking lots, or visitors at commercial buildings. Property owners owe invitees the highest standard of care under Michigan law.
A viable premises liability claim typically involves these elements:
Each of these elements requires supporting evidence. Photographs taken at the scene, incident reports filed with the property, surveillance footage, and witness statements all help build a stronger case. The sooner that evidence is gathered, the better.

Michigan follows a modified comparative fault system under MCL 600.2959. If a jury finds you partly at fault for your fall, your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault.
If you are more than 50% at fault, you lose the right to recover any non-economic damages, which includes pain and suffering.
Property owners and their insurers use comparative fault aggressively in slip and fall cases. Some of the most common arguments include:
After the Kandil-Elsayed ruling, these arguments no longer kill a case outright. They may reduce the amount a jury awards, but they do not eliminate the property owner’s liability by default.
A Kent County slip and fall attorney at Goodman Acker may push back on inflated fault percentages with evidence of the property owner’s own failures.
A premises liability lawsuit in Kent County may seek compensation for the full range of harm caused by the fall. Michigan does not cap non-economic damages in premises liability cases, so the value of a claim depends on the severity of the injuries and the strength of the evidence.
Recoverable damages in a Michigan slip and fall case may include:
Michigan’s statute of limitations gives injured people three years from the date of the fall to file a premises liability lawsuit under MCL 600.5805. Falls on government-owned property in Michigan carry a much shorter notice requirement.
In many cases, written notice must be provided to the government agency within 120 days of the incident. Missing that deadline may permanently bar the claim, even if the three-year filing deadline has not passed.
Call Goodman Acker’s Grand Rapids office at 616-582-7225 if you have questions about a deadline that may apply to your case.

Not necessarily, but reporting the fall creates a record that supports your claim later. If the property has an incident report process, filing one helps document the time, location, and conditions at the time of the fall.
A trip and fall attorney in Grand Rapids may still pursue a case without a formal report if other evidence exists.
A delay in treatment does not automatically prevent you from filing a claim, but it may give the property owner’s insurance company room to argue that the fall did not cause your injuries.
Seeking medical attention soon after a fall creates a clear connection between the incident and the resulting harm.
Hip fractures, wrist fractures, knee injuries, herniated discs, and traumatic brain injuries are among the most frequent. Falls on ice and snow in West Michigan often involve hard impacts on frozen pavement, which tend to produce more severe injuries than falls on indoor surfaces.
Your health insurance may pay your medical bills initially, but Michigan law often requires reimbursement to the insurer from any settlement or verdict.
Your attorney factors these liens into the total recovery so you understand the net amount before accepting a settlement.
A landlord may be liable if the fall occurred in a common area that the landlord controls and maintains, such as a shared stairwell, parking lot, or entryway.
Michigan law holds landlords to maintenance standards in areas that remain under their responsibility, even in residential rental properties.
You may have a case if the property owner failed to salt, plow, or otherwise address the icy condition within a reasonable time.
Michigan law requires commercial property owners to take reasonable steps to protect visitors from winter hazards. The Kandil-Elsayed ruling means the visibility of the ice alone does not bar your claim.
Goodman Acker takes premises liability cases on a contingency fee basis. You pay no attorney fees unless the case results in a recovery.
Michigan court rules cap contingency fees at one-third of the total recovery in personal injury and wrongful death cases.
Liability waivers are uncommon in retail and restaurant settings. If a property owner asks you to sign a release after a fall, speaking with a premises liability lawyer before signing is the safest course of action. A signed release may limit your legal options depending on its language.
The property owner’s insurance adjuster is already building a case against you. Every conversation you have with that adjuster, every gap in your medical records, and every day without documented evidence gives the defense more room to reduce or deny your claim.
Goodman Acker’s Grand Rapids office is located on East Beltline Avenue SE. We handle premises liability cases throughout Kent County and West Michigan, and your family pays nothing unless we recover compensation.
Call 616-582-7225 to talk through the facts of your fall and find out where your case stands.